Become a Member
Michael Freedland

By

Michael Freedland,

Michael Freedland

Opinion

Put the Anglo in Anglo-Jewish

February 17, 2013 19:00
3 min read

A generation ago, I was deeply opposed to Jewish schools. I didn’t send any of my children to them because I believed they could not possibly live in a world where their neighbours were not Jewish but where they never met a gentile in the classroom.

That concern did not extend to the next generation. All my six grandchildren have gone or are going to Jewish schools and I am delighted. Remembering my own experience of being one of just six Jews in school, my immediate reaction was to be glad that they would come home singing Maoz Tzur and not Away in a Manger. But there’s more. They are supposedly conscious of their heritage, of the Hebrew language, of Jewish history.

Jewish history? Well, yes, they have heard about the Rambam; I suppose (I hope) they know about Theodor Herzl and the establishment of Israel. But what do they know about Moses Montefiore or about the Montagus, Lily and Edwin, about Herbert Samuel, Selig Brodetsky or Joseph Hertz, about Moses Gaster — or even about Menasseh ben Israel?

In other words, what about Anglo-Jewish history? I once had a colleague on my radio programme who was intrigued by a guest talking about the historic Bevis Marks synagogue. “I’ve never heard of your shul,” he told him. We were dumbfounded. Not only was this such an institution in our community, but to think it normal to use the word “shul” when talking about a Sephardi synagogue was amazing. Even more so, this fellow was “educated” at the Hasmonean School. In other words, he know a bit of gemorrah and could quote from Ethics of the Fathers. But did he know anything about the “fathers” of our own tiny stretch of the Jewish world?

More from Opinion

More from Opinion