Become a Member
Opinion

Labour needs to realise Jews' identity is inexorably linked to Israel

Yachad's Hannah Weisfeld responds to Jon Lansman's claim Labour was right to reject the IHRA definition of antisemitism

July 13, 2018 15:05
Israeli flag Houses of Parliament
2 min read

In the seven years of Yachad’s existence we have mobilised thousands of British Jews to campaign, including against impending demolitions of Palestinian communities and against the detaining of Palestinian minors in Israeli military courts in the West Bank. We’ve decried racism when it has reared its ugly head in Israel.

We’ve taken on other Jewish communal organisations when they have claimed to have a mandate from the community to publicly support policies of the Israeli and American governments that are not remotely conducive to peace.

We are also the organisation that funded the research on British Jewish attitudes to Israel  which Momentum founder Jon Lansman cited in his article defending Labour's new antisemitism code.

Lansman cites key statistics from the research including that 75% of British Jews believe that settlements are a major obstacle to peace. He questions whether those Jewish communal organisations that have criticised the Labour party for not adopting the most widely accepted definition of antisemitism - the IHRA's - really represent the community given widespread misgivings about policies of Israel's government. The insinuation is that the IHRA definition stifles criticism of Israel, and there are many Jews who are critical of Israel, and therefore they too must have a problem with the IHRA definition.