Become a Member
Theatre

Which Nutcracker should you see this year?

Fans of The Nutcracker are spoilt rotten this year. But are there too many mice at the Coliseum?

December 21, 2016 17:12
The Royal Ballet's chorus at the 'magical' production of The Nutcracker
2 min read

The Royal Ballet is marking Sir Peter Wright's  90th birthday with one of his stagings, made especially for the Royal Opera House. Just down the road, at the London Coliseum, the English National Ballet is performing its own Nutcracker, with choreography by Wayne Eagling, who was himself a principal with the Royal Ballet for many years. The Nutcracker has been at the heart of the ENB’s repertoire since the company was established more than 60 years ago. This current production is its tenth one, and sadly, it lacks the magic of the Royal Ballet’s 30-year-old, more traditional staging.

It does, however, begin with a charming skating scene as the guests arrive for the party. You feel a real chill in the air as the dancers slip and slide across the stage very effectively. The children and doddery old people in the first act can be annoying, but that is a common fault with Nutcrackers in general and audiences are usually impatient for the transformation scene to begin.

For the ENB, that’s where things start to go wrong. Tchaikovsky’s wonderful music should dictate the choreography. Eagling disregards the most enchanting moments of the score, so instead of watching the Christmas tree grow as the music swells, we are stuck with the fighting mice — and irritatingly, they still put in an appearance in the second act.

One of the big decisions facing a director staging this famous ballet is whether to use a child as Clara, or opt for a young, fully trained dancer from the company. The ENB uses a child for the early dances, who runs off mid battle scene to be replaced by an adult Clara — in the performance I saw, she was danced by the exquisitely delicate ballerina Alina Cojocaru. This Clara later emerges as the Sugar Plum Fairy. It’s all a tad confusing.