Become a Member
The Jewish Chronicle

Who is a – musical – Jew?

Do we really need to know if a public figure is Jewish?

July 16, 2009 11:51

By


Norman Lebrecht,

Norman Lebrecht

3 min read

Do we really need to know if a public figure is Jewish? Perhaps, in the case of a politician who can affect the state of nations, or a billionaire who can be tapped by communal charities. In other cases, the interest is either prurient or possessive, a kvell of collective pride signifying nothing.

In music, the search for Jews between the staves can be misleading. It makes no sense, for instance, to categorise Aaron Copland as a “Jewish composer” when only one of his works, an early trio called Vitebsk, contains any echo of heritage. Copland’s singular achievement was to invent a distinctive American sound. To call him a Jewish composer distorts his place in art.

Much the same can be said for George Gershwin, for the modernist Gyorgy Ligeti, the Provençal melodist Darius Milhaud and pretty much every other composer of consequence. Those who call themselves Jewish tend to be the nearly-men, the ones who fall back on communal support when all else fails. The term “Jewish composer” is neither a compliment nor critically useful.

There are four notable exceptions. Two great composers became Jewish in response to Nazism — Arnold Schoenberg, who was prepared to give up music in order to save the Jews, and Kurt Weill who, exiled to Broadway, wrote liturgical Judaica for his father, a retired cantor. Two others became great composers precisely because they were Jewish. Gustav Mahler converted to Christianity to become head of the Vienna Opera, married a non-Jewish wife and was buried by a Catholic priest. Ambition drove him to discard the trappings of Jewishness.