Become a Member
Yoni Birnbaum

ByYoni Birnbaum, Yoni Birnbaum

Opinion

Zoom is no substitute for a real community

At its heart, Jewish communal life is not a business. It isn’t a company that can coldly consider the viability of working from home and a life in video conferencing, writes Yoni Birnbaum

June 1, 2020 09:38
Mobile phone stock image
3 min read

Last week, a fleeting crisis enveloped the Jewish community. As with every event at the moment, it was obviously corona related, but in a rather bizarre way.

For a few brief hours, Zoom was down. Scenes of rabbis and communal leaders scrambling for alternatives filled the WhatsApp airwaves. It was as though the only remaining community lifeline had been severed. Thankfully, the Californian techies soon had Zoom up and running again, so it was back to business as usual in this strange world. But, if we are honest, the outage served to demonstrate just how poor a substitute Zoom is for community.

Let me be clear. Zoom has been an essential tool for us over the past few months. It has brought comfort to bereaved families, it has kept those isolated in touch and it has enabled communities to maintain a semblance of continuity. Weekly pre-Shabbat prayer services and educational classes are the obvious elements of this. And there have also been other less-expected moments of communal joy over Zoom. In my own community, we celebrated the musical talents of people on Lag B’Omer. Nearly a hundred tuned in to what was a genuinely moving and inspirational evening.

And yet, as we move towards considering what Jewish life might look like after the lockdown ends, it is essential that we do not fall into the trap of thinking that Zoom remains a significant alternative to a physical presence. Obviously, for as long as necessary, we should provide Zoom options where possible (and halachically viable) for those who are vulnerable and are unable to attend in person. This is a sacred task for any community that seeks to be inclusive.