Become a Member
Opinion

What does the Saudi-Iran deal mean for Israel?

Don’t panic, Riyadh and Tehran are not forming an alliance. The real danger is China

March 23, 2023 10:23
GettyImages-1248021168
A man in Tehran holds a local newspaper reporting on its front page the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023. - Riyadh and Tehran announced on March 10 that after seven years of severed ties they would reopen embassies and missions within two months and implement security and economic cooperation agreements signed more than 20 years ago. (Photo by ATTA KENARE / AFP) (Photo by ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images)
3 min read

The Middle East has always been an arena in which you can assess the changing dynamics of the Great Powers. When the sun never set on Britain’s empire, that was the region where it did some of its most extensive — some would say destructive — work. When the mantle of world dominance passed to the United States, that was where we saw sustained intervention.

Now, with Washington turning its colossal tanker toward Asia, another power — ironically, the one the Americans most fear — may be stepping into what is starting to look like a void. Jerusalem has long been concerned about a US retreat from the region, and it seems such fears are in danger of being realised.

Last week, Riyadh, the Sunni Lion, and Tehran, the world’s largest and most powerful Shia state, signed a deal negotiated by China. A joint statement declared that the two countries had agreed “to resume diplomatic relations and reopen their embassies” within two months, promising not to interfere in each other’s “internal affairs”.

The story here is both a macro and micro one. At the macro level, it is about China’s changing view of itself in the world. Under the country’s previous leader, Hu Jintao, among Beijing’s key foreign policy principles were “building and accepting a world where countries diverge in their paths of national development and political systems”, rejecting “unilateralism and hegemonic ambitions.”