Become a Member
Opinion

We must take a stand for free speech on campus

Last week’s Oxford Union debate is symptomatic of the alarming deterioration of campus dialogue on Israel

December 6, 2024 12:49
2152024443
Protesters outside King's College, Cambridge in May (Getty Images)
3 min read

The recent Oxford Union debate on the motion “This House Believes Israel is an Apartheid State Responsible for Genocide” was a farcical failure that marked a sinister turning point in campus discourse.

Journalist Jonathan Sacerdoti, invited to speak against the motion, described the atmosphere as “mafia-like,” with constant interruptions and visible toxicity. Even the Union President — expected to ensure neutrality — spoke in favour of the motion, shattering any pretence of impartiality. The inflammatory wording of the motion set the tone for a night that glorified violence, with one speaker shockingly praising the terrorist acts of October 7, leaving Jewish students feeling unsafe and targeted.

This incident is symptomatic of the alarming deterioration of campus dialogue concerning Israel. Two years ago, former Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor addressed the Cambridge Union under similarly tense circumstances. Despite vocal protests, Meridor — a statesman of exceptional intellect and grace — engaged with critics constructively, offering nuanced, thoughtful responses to even the most challenging questions. His presence elevated the debate, embodying the respect and seriousness such topics demand.

The Oxford debate, in contrast, was dominated by provocateurs. On the one side, pro-Palestinian speakers indulged in inflammatory and even unlawful rhetoric. On the other side, some pro-Israel speakers seemed, at times, more focused on publicity than persuasion. The result was an inevitable shouting match in the chamber, bereft of intellectual rigour and incapable of addressing the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The loudest and most repulsive pro-Hamas voices thrive in these conditions.