Become a Member
Eric Pickles

By

Eric Pickles,

Eric Pickles

Opinion

UCU's 'chilling' vote

June 30, 2011 12:14
1 min read

Even the most harmonious society is not immune to irrational hatreds. The Holocaust was designed in the home of Mozart, Goethe and Schiller. A nation's defence against prejudice is not its cultural achievements, but the attitudes and actions of its citizens.

That is why I was concerned about the recent resolution on antisemitism passed by the University and College Union. On the surface, it says that the definition of antisemitism adopted by the National Union of Students and other local university unions "is being used to silence debate about Israel and Palestine on campus."

It is not, by definition, antisemitic to criticise the state of Israel. I would defend anyone's right to express such criticism, however much I might disagree, provided they do not incite violence or hatred.

The UCU, however, is a most unlikely champion of free speech. It has been boycotting visits by Israeli academics for a number years. Much like the
Scottish councils which have banned the purchase of Israeli books in
municipal libraries, their actions suggest that their true goal is not, and cannot be, to secure freedom of speech, but to silence dissenting opinion.