Rupert, don't miss this opportunity

The Jewish Chronicle, est. 1841, has fallen into a black hole and will go under in a couple of weeks unless someone comes up with a rescue plan. What it really needs is a white knight who knows the difference between a newspaper and fishwrap and can see the advantage of being publisher to the Jews.

What’s in it for me, you ask? Forget the knight bit, nobody at the JC ever got gonged. Just consider the influence. Present company excepted, the Jews control the media, right? So how sweet the sound of an Aussie-American Scottish Presbyterian taking over the failing organ of the once-chosen and being welcomed as a saviour into their secret convocations.

Not that secret, mind. We’re talking serious chopped liver here, cut with egg-and-onion, followed by matzah-balls the size of which have not been seen since Crocodile Dundee. We’re talking of a paper that people read before or after (but never during) Friday-night dinner and which they keep for days afterwards, angst-ridden that they might have missed an entry on the hatch-match-dispatch pages. No newspaper to my knowledge ever receives such close line-by-line attention from its readers.

I once heard of a man in Leicester, admittedly of German extraction, who would have his JC ironed with his white shirt on Friday morning and then stapled at the spine so that it could be laid upon his Sabbath table. No disrespect, Mr Murdoch, but I don’t see many readers doing that with The Sun.

If we’re talking influence, the JC is read by everyone you’ll ever need. I was once being treated in pain by an emergency doctor at the Royal Free when he looked up from the affected part and asked, "don’t you write for the JC?" It gets you to the head of the queue, mate, the best of care, the first available operating table. It’s called yichus, or maybe tuchus, one or the other. Leave it to the subs.

What else does it do? It acts as a canary in the coalmine of incitement, peeping out the first whiff of antisemitism. It keeps charities honest and rabbis humble. It treats politicians with kid gloves, especially Israelis who come bearing promises, promises. It is read from Aberdeen to Melbourne, by way of Jo’burg and Mumbai. It is more global than McDonald's, and kosher besides.

What got it into present difficulties started with a pension fund problem and spiralled into critical care with Covid-19, may its name be erased, tfui-tfui. Some of the finest insolvency practitioners are now racking their brains how to save it. We’re talking major-league number-crunchers who saved Premiership clubs from the knacker’s yard and may yet wrest Harry Kane from the grasp of those unsavoury Glasers.

Knacker, by the way, is not what you think. To JC readers, it’s a compliment. A gantser knakker, in Yiddish, is a person of substance, a big-shot, one step up from a communal macher.

You, Rupert, could be the ganste knakker of the Jewish Chronicle. Think about it. A silver kiddush cup with your name engraved on it. A mazal tov from Michael Grade. A rumbling below that is the sound of Robert Maxwell turning in his grave.

At the hour of writing, I hear machers in the northwest of London trying to finesse a deal that will save the JC for generations to come. In these morbid times, we look no further than week ahead in the hope that those we love will still be with us, isolated as they may be.

But among the loved ones, let’s count the JC. The paper has probably annoyed more Jews in the past decade than Jeremy Corbyn and pleased fewer than the Pope. But, beyond the red rash that is the by-product of good journalism, deep down we have a personal affection for the old rag – we, the descendants of immigrants who sold old rags for a living.

The JC must be saved, Mr Murdoch. If you won’t do it, some other knakker will.

Be well

Norman Lebrecht