Become a Member
Letters

Letters to the editor 18 August 2023

Israel protests, God's gender and bagels

August 17, 2023 13:48
Anti-Government Protests In Israel Continue Amid Judicial Standoff GettyImages-1247123609
5 min read

Reflection, please

I read with utter dismay about Rabbi Lev Taylor describing God as a “notorious homosexual” (Rabbi’s ‘God is gay’ post sparks heated debate, August 11). Describing Hashem as having any sort of sexuality is both absurd and blasphemous.

I have been both the chairman and lay minister of a progressive synagogue for almost thirty five years and am very proud of the inclusion of LGBT people in our community, but l cannot stay silent when people who should know better make statements that open us up to ridicule.

Debate about the nature of God is nothing new to Judaism, but statements describing God as a “notorious homosexual” should come out of the mouth of anyone — let alone a rabbi. May l suggest that Rabbi Taylor uses the coming month of Elul to reflect on what he has said and do teshuvah.

David Young,
Bedfordshire Progressive Synagogue


I am the daughter of founding members of South West Essex and Settlement Reform Synagogue. I was most intrigued to read of Rabbi Lev Taylor’s revelation that God has a human body and its concomitant proclivities — and that “wrestling with God” is identical to attributing our baser intentions to Him/Her.

God does not “appear” to anybody as gay, straight, trans or cis, since nobody since Moses has ever “seen” God, and no stream of Judaism has ever taught that God ever took human form — unless Rabbi Taylor knows, or has witnessed, otherwise. The only Jews with pretentions to religiosity that misused sexuality as a form of “wrestling” were the followers of such as Shabbatai Zvi and his “reincarnation”, Jacob Frank (long before the beginnings of Reform Judaism).

I find Rabbi Baginsky’s assertion that this is part of a tradition that goes back to Torah deeply puzzling. I also find Rabbi Helfman’s dismissal of those who refuse to toe the political line as “an angry minority” patronising. As one who “self-identifies”, to borrow the popular phrase, as a Reform Jew on the traditional end of the spectrum, I can only consider their comments to be jejeune and misleading at best. Derech eretz prevents me from describing them “at worst”.

Ruth Hart
Edgware HA8


Friendly advice

Topics:

Letters