Become a Member
The JC

ByThe JC, The JC

Letters

Letters to the Editor, 1 March 2024

February 29, 2024 16:51
gettyimages-2036605293-2048x2048
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 24: Barbra Streisand accepts the SAG Lifetime Achievement Award onstage during the 30th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at Shrine Auditorium and Expo Hall on February 24, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images)
3 min read

Hen Mazzig refers to archeological and historic reasons for the link between Jews and Israel (Forget ‘colonialism’. Jews are indigenous to Israel, 23 February). But he rightly prefers not to have to fall back on an indigenous narrative. Like him, I don’t feel a need to appease the fashionable fury of social justice warriors. The 1947 United Nations Resolution 181, together with the established presence of a population now approaching 10 million, is amply sufficient to provide the intellectual scaffolding. And, while respecting love of the bible, I don’t myself require an origin story in support of modern Israel.

However, anyone wanting to make a convincing argument for the link between the people and the place should look into the striking evidence that DNA extracted from the contemporary Jewish population, particularly the Ashkenazi male line, shows a strong connection with ancient bones disinterred from the Levantine area. See in particular the work of Shai Carmi, David Reich, Harry Ostrer, Doron Behar et al. But there is also linkage evidence for Palestinians, so while Jews can reliably rebut claims that they were originally descended from Europeans, and, in particular Khazars, the indigenous narrative is of little help in the quest for a just resolution.

Steven Fogel

London NW11

Topics:

Letters