Become a Member
Jonathan Boyd

ByJonathan Boyd, Jonathan Boyd

Opinion

Identity politics must not distort real figures

'With a current intermarriage rate of about 58 per cent, the boundaries around who is and who is not Jewish in the US are becoming increasingly blurred'

June 4, 2020 14:11
Members of Jewish Community Action protest about the death of George Floyd in Minnesota
3 min read

One doesn’t need to be a terribly astute observer of American politics to see that race is one of the most contentious issues in the country. The violent clashes between police and protesters in Minneapolis and beyond following the appalling death of George Floyd, a Black man asphyxiated by a White policeman after being pulled over on suspicion of using counterfeit money, is just the latest episode in a long history of terrible incidents involving African Americans in the US.

Perhaps this context goes some way to explain an extraordinary recent spat in American Jewry about how many “Jews of Color” (ie Blacks, Hispanics, mixed-race, other non-Whites) there are in the American Jewish population.

The issue has its origins in a 2019 report published by a group of Stanford University academics entitled Counting Inconsistencies, which estimated that 12-15 per cent of American Jews are Jews of colour. More pointedly, it argued that most recent Jewish community studies have neglected to investigate race or ethnicity at all, and have thus systematically undercounted non-White, non-Ashkenazi Jews thereby causing them to be sidelined within the Jewish community. Their findings have been heralded by various Jewish activist groups, community leaders and social scientists for shining a light on a marginalised minority and, some claim, for exposing the implicit racism present in previous demographic work.

But the controversy kicked off when two highly regarded veteran Jewish scholars, Professor Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer, and Dr Arnold Dashefsky, a University of Connecticut sociologist, published an op ed based on a much more detailed academic article they have written. In it, they dispute the quantitative assessment in the Stanford study, and argue that the true proportion is actually six per cent.