Become a Member
Opinion

How to resolve disputes with empathy and stories – by a former peace negotiator

The world has changed since October 7, but we can disagree respectfully

April 10, 2025 14:47
GettyImages-1803327289.jpg
A protester holds reading "Coexist" during a demonstration in central London, on November 26, 2023, to protest against antisemitism (Getty)
3 min read

In the following extract from his forthcoming book Beyond Dispute: Rediscovering the Jewish Art of Constructive Disagreement, former Israeli ambassador Daniel Taub describes how he learned to use the power of storytelling to faciliate understanding on some of the most sensitive issues.

With younger audiences I learned that rather than regaling them with a history of the Middle East, sharing stories would be more engaging and lasting. A story does not need to be lengthy; legend has it that Ernest Hemingway won a bet that he couldn’t write a story in only six words with the moving two-sentence story, ‘For sale; baby shoes. Never worn.’

With this in mind, when meeting youngsters I would take with me a small box of objects, each of which illustrated a story about Israeli life. A packet of Bamba, the unusual Israeli puffed peanut snack, which has been found to inoculate Israeli kids from peanut allergies and which serves as a metaphor for a society that encourages its children to take risks and develop resilience. An airway resuscitation tube, as a reminder of my IDF combat medic course in which I was sworn to treat all the height of conflict. A model of an El Al plane, as a reminder of the time I was on an El Al flight with a passenger who complained that his seat was wobbly, until the stewardess explained that the seats had all been removed the night before so as to maximise capacity when rescuing Ethiopian Jews and flying them to safety in Israel, and has been hurriedly put back in place that morning. And so on.

If I make an effort to bring stories into discussions, it is in large part because I have seen how deeply they are able to affect my own thinking. In the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations I was involved with, for example, discussions of Israeli’s security measures often trod a predictably unproductive course. The Israeli side is well rehearsed at providing statistics of attempted terrorist attacks to highlight the need for its restrictions. But hearing firsthand from your Palestinian counterpart about the impact of crossing points and entry permits on the daily life of individuals has the power to provide a different perspective.