Become a Member
Opinion

Covid has shown us that rules do matter in life

Unbridled personal freedom is no good, in normal times as well as during the pandemic

July 29, 2021 13:52
GettyImages-1175643774-min (1).jpg
3 min read

In the afterglow of ‘freedom day’, Boris Johnson wants us all to think in terms of personal responsibility, rather than formal rules. Yet from a traditional Jewish perspective, the two have never been mutually exclusive. Rules are essential, Judaism says. Leave it up to individual conscience alone and the result is anarchy. Laws, which we call halacha, engender the commitment necessary for taking personal responsibility. There is no better illustration of this than the experience of recent months.

Law in its purest form represents a set of non-negotiable mandatory instructions. Yet, supposedly, contemporary society finds the entire notion of rules and regulations governing everyday life difficult to accept. In a liberal democracy, the concept of personal freedom, or what Sir Isaiah Berlin called ‘negative freedom’, the right to freedom from interference by others, reigns supreme. We cherish the freedom to choose our path in life and make personal decisions for our own future however we see fit. The idea that extensive rules governing the minutiae of our lives should be seen as normal is outrageous.

The debate over the relaxation of Covid regulations over recent months has thrown these societal assumptions on their head. Millions of people around the country reacted with concern and worry at each stage of unlocking, particularly when approaching stage four of the government’s roadmap. Even those who are ostensibly at very low risk from Covid remain concerned about the freedom to do things as simple as entering a crowded bar or sitting next to someone unmasked on the Tube. Why?

The most logical explanation is that society has come to realise that if there is a certain fear of harm, a system of law designed to protect against coming to that harm is the best way of dealing with it. The loss of personal free choice is outweighed, in these circumstances, by the benefits gained through keeping the rules, whether to ourselves, those closest to us, or society at large. Personal freedom remains an important, essential value. It is simply outweighed in these circumstances by a more important value — the need for rules to protect us from harm.