Photographer to the stars convicted of harassing Rinkoff baking family

 Others named in the harassment charges include lifestyle manager Sarah-Jane Adler and former friend, bakery supplier Geoffrey Kluman.

 Lecash is credited with being the photographer on a number of iconic album covers from the Eighties, including Rod Stewart's Body Wishes LP, Barry Manilow's Paradise Café, Jermaine Jackson's Dynamite and Crimes of Passion by Pat Banetar.

 He also worked with David Bowie and Jefferson Airplane before becoming a TV and film producer.

 Lecash had replied to a police email one 24 January last year saying he would not send any more emails, but continued to do so, Westminster Magistrates' Court heard.

 He was finally charged with harrasment on 23 July.

 Jonathan Bryan, prosecuting, said: “Even if you come to the conclusion that Mr Lecash himself did not know what he did amounted to harassment.

 “Given the emails you’ve seen, any reasonable person would realise the number of emails and their content would amount to harassment.”

 Mr Sundeep Pankhania, defending, argued that none of the complainants, including members of his family, asked LeCash to stop sending emails.

 Mr Pankhania explained that LeCash was involved in a number of documentaries and writing a book called “John Lennon Made Me toast”.

 LeCash said: “This book is about my life and a very important literary agent wants me to write it in London.”

 He explained that the book would involve family members and some or all of the allegations that have been put to them in the emails.

 One of the documentaries, “Follow the Gr$$d”, was about the death of bankrupt property tycoon Scot Young who died after he plunged to his death onto railings from his penthouse flat in 2014.

 The second documentary was called “Bagels and Cyanide”, he said.

 “I had taken a hiatus from work for five years to single-handedly raise my daughter.

 “The only way I could see of trying to make a living was to restart my TV company. 

 “I needed to somehow make a living.

 “I was looking for ways to make documentaries with information that was already in my head.

 “The point of sending emails was to get a response.

 “I never got an email being sent back to me as blocked.”

 Asked why he persistently emailed and didn’t stop when he received no response, he said: “That’s my technique, I don’t take no for an answer.”

 He denied the fact that he knew what he was doing amounted to harassment.

 “I feel very strongly that I am totally entitled to contact as many people as I like if I’m making a documentary. 

“If you’re a producer you have to be completely tenacious.”

 The court also saw clips from emails, including one to his niece, Sarah-Jane Adler, which said: “You are a total b—ch”.

 Mr Bryan said: “Abusing and insulting people is only going to produce two possible responses.

“One is either they tell you to stop or they go to the police which is what happened in this case.

 “My suggestion is that you must of known this was causing distress to the recipients of those emails anyone making those allegations using those insults would have called a great deal of distress to the recipients.

 Lecash replied: “Every single creative person in the world has a different way of dealing with things.

“I just felt that the truth had to be brought out.

“It was my total journalistic privilege to bring the truth out.”

Wearing a brown checked shirt over a brown jumper, Lecash showed no emotion as Deputy District Judge Briony Clarke convicted him of six offences of harassment without violence.

 Lecash, of Chelsea Cloisters, Chelsea, southwest London, denied the charges.

 Judge Clarke said: “He says he didn’t know his conduct amounted to harassment.

 “He said that he accepted that he knew the emails might cause distress he said that was the price he was willing to pay for the documentaries.

 “My judgement [given the volume, recipients, nature of the emails, and period of time] is that any reasonable person would think this course of conduct would amount to harassment of another.

 “It doesn’t matter there was no official harassment warning given to him by the police.

 “Not once have I seen an email when any of the recipients had been asked to take part, contact him or be interviewed about it.

 “In actual fact this was a campaign of revenge on his family with whom he doesn’t get on.

 “I also take the view, given what he has said, the defendant knew these emails and course of conduct would amount to harassment.”

The judge adjourned sentencing Lecash until a date to be fixed. He was granted bail on condition he does not contact any of the complainants.