Become a Member
News

Peer attacks shechita as ‘unacceptable’

January 23, 2014 16:00

By

Marcus Dysch,

Marcus Dysch

1 min read

Clearer labelling of meat should be introduced in Britain to help identify animals killed in accordance with religious slaughter, peers have argued.

During a fierce debate in the House of Lords, shechita was described as “barbaric” and “absolutely unacceptable” before Jewish peers rallied to defend the practice.

The animal welfare and slaughter methods debate, prompted by a question from veterinary professor Lord Trees, concentrated on “ethical, legal and religious factors” relating to pre-slaughter stunning and the labelling of the meat produced.

Animals used for kosher and halal meat are not stunned before slaughter.