Become a Member
News

Does the UCU harbour hate? You decide

April 4, 2013 15:30
Sally Hunt
1 min read

In 2006, Ronnie Fraser stood as a delegate to NATFHE conference (a predecessor to UCU). It was said at the regional meeting that Mr Fraser could not be a delegate because he was a Zionist and therefore a racist. NATFHE held an investigation and found that this statement had not been antisemitic.

Israel has been relentlessly condemned at every UCU congress, often by motions to boycott Israel. There were no motions to boycott any other states.

The Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism reported that the boycott debates were likely to cause difficulties for Jewish academics and students, to exclude Jews from academic life and to have a detrimental effect on Jewish Studies. UCU responded that these allegations were made to stop people from criticising Israel. Seventy-six members of the UCU published a critique of the union’s response but the union took no notice. John Mann MP told the tribunal that UCU had been unique among those criticised by the inquiry in its refusal to listen.

Sean Wallis, a local UCU official, said that anti-boycott lawyers were financed by “bank balances from Lehman Brothers that can’t be tracked down”. Ronnie Fraser asked him whether he had indeed made this antisemitic claim. Mr Wallis admitted having said it. But it was Mr Fraser who, for the crime of asking, was found to have violated union rules concerning “rude or offensive communications”.