Become a Member
Life

Why Bolland is ideal for M&S

December 3, 2009 10:00

ByAlex Brummer, Alex Brummer

3 min read

The choice of Marc Bolland of grocer Wm Morrison to be the next chief executive of Marks & Spencer has been treated in the media and by the stock market as a second coming. Since executive chairman Sir Stuart Rose unveiled his successor as chief executive last month, the reaction has been wholly positive and the group’s shares have soared towards 400p, almost double the low point at the worst of the great panic a year ago.

Why the enthusiasm? There is a clear sense of relief that the long search for Rose’s successor is over. Even Rose himself looks to be relieved, unburdening himself on Radio 4’s Desert Island Discs and turning up at social events from Morgan Stanley’s Thanksgiving Lunch to Sir Victor Blank’s farewell party at Lloyds Banking Group with a smile on his face and starting to think about his next assignment.

Rose’s greatest achievement at M&S, since he was hired in May 2004 to save the group from the attentions of his fellow retail knight Sir Philip Green, was to re-establish public and shareholder faith in the nation’s most emblematic retail brand. In 2007-08 he brought M&S within a whisker of returning to £1bn profit a year, before the recession knocked trade for six.

Faith in his leadership was temporarily rocked in the City in 2008, when, after boardroom disruption, Lord Burns stepped down as chairman and Rose, in breach of codes of corporate governance, stepped up to become executive chairman. Rose volunteered a public denial that he wanted to be “king of M&S”.