Become a Member
Life

What Nathan Englander talks about when he talks about his Anne Frank play

The American writer on the Patrick Marber-directed stage adaptation of his 2011 Pulitzer-finalist short story ahead of its UK premiere

October 9, 2024 16:21
WWTA_MattCrockett_Aug24_85656_RT
In partnership: Nathan Englander and Patrick Marber Credit: Matt Crockett
7 min read

I am an anxious person and an anxious writer,” Nathan Englander says in a conversation so impassioned that he barely comes up for air as we run the gamut from sourdough to intergenerational trauma and Israel-Gaza. And writing, which he compares to an ultra-marathon-runner friend sprinting 120 miles until his toenails fall off. “I don’t know if he would say it’s fun… Writing is really stressful and torturous for me. And I wouldn’t do anything else.”

This past year has been particularly torturous for the New York-born author. Ever since Leopoldstadt director Patrick Marber approached him to do the UK stage premiere of What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank, a play based on his 2011 Pulitzer-finalist short story, he had been rewriting the script to meet Marber’s vision. But when October 7 happened it was clear he needed to rewrite it again.

Patrick Marber and the cast
Photo: Mark SeniorPatrick Marber and the cast Photo: Mark Senior[Missing Credit]

But it’s not as if he’s not used to reworking something obsessively. He is not, as he points out, the type to put out a book every nine months like Joyce Carol Oates, or his late friend Philip Roth. “I’m also writing every day, but until I feel like a thing is ready, I will live with it in this obsessive manner,” he says.

It is early Toronto time for an interview, but Englander assures me he’s already been up for some time attending, online, the rehearsal of the play in London. Speaking from the chaotic basement of his home in the Canadian city, surrounded by his children’s skates and hockey sticks (“very Canadian!”) – and books, he had been “gobsmacked” when he received an email from Marber asking if they could collaborate to get the play on the stage, and not least by the brevity of the “to-the-point” message when he himself writes lengthy “19th century missives”.