So we get it. Being Jewish is very important to David Baddiel. It’s at the core of his identity. And this existential reality makes him particularly sensitive to the antisemitic tropes, rhetoric and activity he detects all around him. That, and the fact that his mother was born in Nazi Germany and whose scarring experiences are an acknowledged part of the author’s psychic inheritance.
Interestingly, in a book detailing his finely tuned alertness to antisemitic undercurrents in the arts, the media, on football terraces and across the political spectrum, the word “paranoia” never appears. It can’t, because Baddiel’s fundamental axiom is, in the light (or perhaps darkness) of the Holocaust, “how scared, at base, Jews are.”
In this book, Baddiel’s vitriol is aimed particularly at left-leaning “progressives” who seem to care about every other ethnic minority but Jews. At the heart of this passionately felt polemic (which leaves no room for nuance) is a question for the reader: Do you think of Jews as part of the BAME (Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic) community? Baddiel argues that, if you don’t, you should.
The problem with this is that feeling something is true doesn’t make it so. BAME was an invented analytic category, originating in the 1991 census to assist government policy-making.
Its usefulness has increasingly been contested over the years, often by specific minority groups (the Chinese community, for example) who don’t feel they fit into this artificial framework. Baddiel doesn’t discuss this – nor does he mention that Jews have never been included as a sub-community in the official BAME category.
Objective analysis of antisemitism — and the conscious and unconscious antipathy he describes is, of course, real – is of no interest here but, like the antisemitic discourse he decries, priority goes to the inviolable supremacy of personal feeling. And in “identity politics” nobody is allowed to argue with that.
Baddiel shows how Jews are stereotyped by racists in contradictory ways: they are thieving, deceitful, dirty – and privileged, rich and powerful, an accurate though not original insight. What is novel is his capacity, in the solitary sentence in the book that describes any aspect of the Judaic heritage — “The Talmud is a book of exegesis of the Old Testament, codified in the fourteenth century and containing the basis of all the archaic rules and laws of Judaism” — to generate a quartet of errors. The Talmud is not a book of biblical exegesis; it is a multi-volume compendium of law and lore, theology and story-telling. “Old Testament” is a Christian, not Jewish term, one redolent of old-style antisemitism. Talmud was codified in the sixth century. And to say it contains the basis of all the archaic rules and laws is a pejorative formulation carrying its own, unconscious antisemitism.
There’s no shame in being a self-confessed Jewish atheist but it is a shame, while defending the integrity of Jewishness with such vigour, to present such an ignorant interpretation of it.
Howard Cooper is a rabbi, writer and psychotherapist
