Become a Member
Life

The Jew(ish) actor playing Shylock at the Globe

Taking the role of Shakespeare’s villain raises hard questions, reports Kate Maltby

March 3, 2022 09:23
The Merchant Of Venice-Sam Wanamaker Playhouse-Tristram Kenton-(2)-Adrian Schiller playing Shylock
A scene from The Merchant Of Venice by William Shakespeare @ Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, Shakespeare's Globe. Directed by Abigail Graham. (Opening 02-03-2022) ©Tristram Kenton 02-22 (3 Raveley Street, LONDON NW5 2HX TEL 0207 267 5550 Mob 07973 617 355)email: tristram@tristramkenton.com
6 min read


Adrian Schiller has spent the last few weeks at Shakespeare’s Globe in Southwark, hearing the word “Jew” spat at him. The veteran performer, who also stars on TV in Viking drama The Last Kingdom, is the latest actor to take on the role of Shylock, in Abigail Graham’s new production of The Merchant of Venice. “I think they use his name, Shylock, three times in the whole play”, Schiller, who is Jewish, observes. “Otherwise, it’s ‘Jew this, Jew that’.”

Last week, the JC’s theatre critic John Nathan considered whether The Merchant of Venice should be “cancelled”, or never again performed. Schiller takes the question seriously. “Our production is about exposing the antisemitism. It’s not about Jewishness, it’s about antisemitism. But even so, we know there will be antisemites in the audience, because there are always people who come along to Shakespeare plays not knowing the theme, and there are antisemites everywhere. And there will also be Jews in the audience, and so we know at times those Jews will feel very, very isolated, because they will be surrounded by people who are going to laugh at antisemitic tropes, to laugh at Shakespeare’s antisemitic jokes. Our job is to expose that.”

The antisemitic insults, Schiller says, “are a poison pill which we have to swallow”, but most of them are directed his way, which is hard. “You have to sort of let yourself become a mist, and just let them pass through.” He tells me that his reward is the chance to force an audience to confront its assumptions about Jews. Schiller talks in detail about the famous moment when Shylock hears news of his daughter Jessica, who has eloped with a Christian and stolen some of his money. “Instead of talking about her, Shylock talks about the money,” Schiller reminds me, and in antisemitic productions this moment is indeed used to suggest a man who cares more for money than his family. But as Schiller points out: “Quite deliberately, the playwright aims the grief through that lesser loss, the money, because it’s almost impossible for Shylock to talk about his daughter. The thing that really kills him in the end is that she’s sold his engagement ring. And my feeling is that this particular point in the play is an antisemitic litmus-test. If you really think that what he’s upset about is the money, you’re an antisemite.”

What Schiller and I spend most of our time talking about, however, is the raging war over identity politics in theatre, and the impact this has on Jewish theatre makers. Increasingly, actors of all backgrounds are required to share an ethnicity or sexuality with the characters they play. Theatre makers point out that they want to tell stories from a place of understanding. But the question of who gets to tell Jewish stories has exposed the problems with such a simplistic approach.

This January, Maureen Lipman generated headlines after telling the JC of her concern at seeing Helen Mirren made up to resemble Golda Meir for a new biopic; she later clarified in a letter to the Guardian that only “if the ethnicity or gender of the character drives the role then that ethnicity should be prioritised, as it is now with other minorities.” As the director Adam Lenson pointed out in the JC, most Jewish theatre activists who have led this conversation “were absolutely not saying that only Jewish actors should play Jews”, but simply asking that “Jewish artists were allowed into discussions about their own stories… which can be independent from the issue of casting”.