Become a Member
Opinion

Succession was a rare portrayal of greed that wasn't antisemitic

It's rare to see billionaires depicted without invoking Jewish themes

June 1, 2023 09:48
succession-s4-ka-1920 0
3 min read

In the end, Succession was never really about power. The HBO TV series was marketed as the story of a power struggle: the tale of a media mogul’s children each jostling to assert themselves as his successor. “King Lear meets the Murdochs” was an early tagline.

Between the references to Shakespeare’s political tragedies and its unremittingly dark vision of influence-peddling between media, politics and tech players, Jesse Armstrong’s show couldn’t help but teach us something about power along the way. Yet it wasn’t the quest for power that actually turned the wheels of Succession’s plot. Each twist of the tale was driven by something much simpler: money.

Tom Wambsgans, tycoon Logan Roy’s son-in-law, gave us the show’s keycode halfway through the final season, had we chosen to hear him. Tom was the only one of Succession’s main players born without the security of deep wealth, as he reminded his wife Shiv while he sought to justify a corporate betrayal that wrecked their marriage. “All my life, I’ve been thinking a little bit about money. And how to get money, and how to keep money.”

With the security of money — their financial shares of the business were always guaranteed — Shiv and her brothers Kendall and Roman were free to play games for other stakes. Politics, film-making, the ego–thrill of corporate leadership. It divorced them from the language that everyone around them was speaking. (“I’m just trying to make you f***ing rich”, said corporate raider Lukas Matsson. “Already rich” said Kendall, blocking a takeover deal others would have killed for.)

Topics:

Culture