Become a Member
Analysis

Jeremy Corbyn’s gold standard code on antisemitism is far from black and white

Labour’s definition of Jew-hate appears to raise more questions than it answers, writes John Ware

August 2, 2018 13:41
Jeremy Corbyn image with IHRA definition
6 min read

Would the act of Jeremy Corbyn’s hosting a 2010 parliamentary event comparing Israel’s Gaza policy to Nazi Germany have been adjudged antisemitic under Labour’s new antisemitism code of conduct which it claims to be “the new gold standard”?

Probably not. While the code says such an analogy carries a “strong risk of being regarded as prejudicial” to the interests of the party, it seems doubtful Labour would be willing to concede it was antisemitic. 

For that, says the code, there would need to be evidence of antisemitic intent. 

Proving this would require an objective test of Corbyn’s subjective state of mind which is a very high evidential threshold. Protestations of his unimpeachable lifelong anti-racism would presumably be a defence against any suggestion that he intended to be antisemitic.