The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is always on the news, with British media outlets reporting extensively on Israel’s actions. I’ve explained before why journalists love reporting from Israel, based on my experience as a diplomat in Jerusalem, Cairo and London. One of the explanations is that covering Israel is free from risk. Israel is an open society, and there are no repercussions for those who criticise it. I have met many journalists in other countries in the Middle East. They have to operate in accordance with the government position or suffer severe consequences.
In contrast to the situation in Israel, it is the complete opposite case for Palestinians. This is one of the reasons that the news has an inherent bias. You might be unaware of it — and maybe some people want you to be.
There are different governing entities in control in Gaza and Ramallah. However, there is a commonality in all areas of Palestinian control, whether under the terrorist organisation, Hamas, or the Palestinian Authority: free speech does not exist. Journalists, officials, teachers, doctors, academics, farmers, all are forced to give the same narrative.
In Israel, as in other Western countries, criticism of the government and its policies is an inherent part of its robust democratic society. But a Palestinian who dared to speak against their leadership would be threatened, jailed, or tortured. This is the sad reality for millions of Palestinians living under a totalitarian regime or the control of terror organisations.