Become a Member
Judaism

Fast food that gives a true taste of freedom

Why is matzah called both the 'bread of affliction' and the 'bread of freedom'?

April 14, 2011 11:01
Primed for Pesach: a matzah maker stacks the ovens in Jerusalem

ByRabbi Jonathan Wittenberg, Rabbi Jonathan Wittenberg

3 min read

I have always loved matzah, annoying everyone around me; even the dog looks disappointed when he does not receive his customary challah. But I have also felt intrigued by the paradox in the matzah's essence. What does it actually represent? Is it the bread of poverty and the fare of slaves, or the bread of hope and the food of the free?

"If one explanation is not what you need to hear this Pesach, turn the matzah over and try the other," wrote the contemporary American theologian Arthur Green. But the truth is that the matzah is not either one or the other, but tastes both of slavery and liberty at once. Precisely that is why it represents our journey towards redemption.

Ha lachma anya, we say at the start of the Seder, "This is the bread of affliction". It is an apt description for a foodstuff made from one of the five kinds of permitted grains, wheat, barley, spelt, rye or oats, with water as the sole other ingredient. One possible etymological derivation connects matzah with the Aramaic word for tasteless. The Torah also calls it "the bread of poverty" because, observed Samuel Al-Magribi "poor people, in the severity of their destitution, will take some flour, knead it, and bake it into unleavened cakes which they eat immediately...Others say it means bread injurious to the digestive system." It also represents the Temple offering brought by the poorest of the poor.

Matzah thus expresses our identification with the suffering and the oppressed. We break the middle of the three matzot used at the Seder, because, says the Talmud, the destitute are never able to afford a whole loaf of bread. Holding up this broken piece, we invite the hungry and needy to join us. One "who locks the door… and eats and drinks with his wife and family, without giving anything…to the poor and bitter in soul…is not rejoicing in a divine commandment, but… in his own stomach", declared Maimonides.