Become a Member
Judaism

Can it still be right to mourn for Jerusalem?

Israel's capital is a thriving city, so how can we say prayers lamenting its fall on Tishah b'Av next week?

August 4, 2011 12:06
Happy families in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem

By

Rabbi Gideon Sylvester,

Rabbi Gideon Sylvester

3 min read

Legend has it that the Emperor Napoleon came to Jerusalem on the fast of Tishah b'Av. Deeply moved by the sight of hundreds of Jews sitting on the ground weeping for the Temple, he declared: "A people who mourns for its temple after thousands of years will live to see it rebuilt."

Although the Temple has not yet been restored, Jerusalem is no longer in ruins, it is a modern bustling capital, so should we still be mourning? The issue was first raised in July 1920 by the British High Commissioner of Palestine, Sir Herbert Samuel, who wrote to the Chief Rabbi, Rav Kook, to inquire whether the fast could be suspended. The great sage replied that the time was not yet ripe.

But after the victory of the Six Day War, with the thrill of seeing the Old City of Jerusalem returned to Jewish control, the questions resurfaced. For thousands of years, Jews who visited Jerusalem ripped their clothes in mourning as prescribed by the Talmud. Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, the great leader of American Jewry, was asked by Jews travelling to Israel whether this was still necessary. He replied that even though the final redemption had not yet come and it was still appropriate to rip clothes at the Western Wall, " they do not have to tear their clothes when they see Jerusalem since, by the loving-kindness of the Holy One Blessed be He, it has been gloriously rebuilt and it is no longer under the control of gentiles" .

The renewal of life in Jerusalem also raised questions about the prayers of Tishah b'Av which describe Jerusalem as "the city that is in mourning and in ruins, despised and desolate". Responding to a question on this, the Chief Rabbi of Tel Aviv, Rabbi Haim David Halevy, made an astonishing admission; he wrote that he could no longer say these words, for they were no longer true and reciting them would have turned him into one who lies before God.