Become a Member
The Jewish Chronicle

Getting property returned still uphill task

August 13, 2009 09:29

By

David Peleg

3 min read

It is just over a month since representatives of 46 countries gathered in Prague for the Holocaust Era Assets Conference; possibly the last chance, as US Ambassador Stuart Eizenstat described it, to see that justice prevails.

In the immediate aftermath of the war, attention, understandably, was focused on rescuing people, not property. But the scale of the looting, first by the Nazis and then, in Eastern Europe, by the Communist regimes, demanded an international response. In the late 90s, gradually Western governments — urged on by the World Jewish Restitution Organisation (WJRO) — began to put pressure on the successor governments in eastern Europe to make restitution of private and community property to their former owners.

It has been an uphill task and the achievements have been mixed. There has been success in restoring some looted art, for example, where international museums agreed to look more closely at provenance, and some valuable artwork has been returned to the heirs of Holocaust victims. Less good has been the record in some countries in Eastern Europe: Latvia has carried out personal restitution, but not that of immovable property (communal buildings, for example), while Lithuania has done neither.

The Prague conference was called to review the Washington Declaration of 1998, which set in motion art restitution.