There are few words that seem to cause more annoyance than “teacher strikes”. The disruption can be considerable, not only to the children who are losing out on their learning, but to parents who are often unable to go to work if a school closes.
For school leaders this is also a difficult time. As always, the priority must be to ensure a safe environment for their students and if there are insufficient teachers, then a school would be forced to close. Some schools will try to arrange a distanced learning provision, but as we all know too well, this is far from ideal.
Strikes are intended to be disruptive and the impact on children’s learning cannot be understated. As a parent of an A level student in the final term before her exams, I am sure the last thing she needs is six days of disrupted learning. Interestingly, this concern is reflected in Jewish law, with many rabbis questioning whether it is acceptable for a teacher to strike.
This places many teachers in a difficult position. They have dedicated their lives to education and now find themselves taking action that interrupts their students’ learning. Yet if they don’t strike, it sends a message that they are not sympathetic to the concerns being raised, which is simply untrue.