Become a Member
The Jewish Chronicle

A Jewish lesson for Jon Venables

Taking on a new identity is fraught with dangers — and we should know

March 11, 2010 11:07

By

Keren David,

Keren David

3 min read

In all the thousands of words written and broadcast this week on the case of Jon Venables, one family has been conspicuously silent. I very much hope that the parents and sister of Sharona Joseph will not object to me writing about their loss, 22 years after her murder at the hands of an older child. I do so because I believe their wisdom and experience has much to offer the current rancourous debate.

Like James Bulger, Sharona was only two when she was led away from a children's party by a 12-year-old boy. Her death at his hands did not cause a national outcry, or an outpouring of moral debate. At the end of his trial, his right to anonymity was lifted - but later reimposed, after the Bulger case. Few beyond her family and community knew of Sharona's death; it did not seem to catch the public imagination as did the murder of James Bulger a few years later.

Nine years ago, Sharona's father Geoffrey Joseph gave an interview to a newspaper. He backed rehabilitation and education for young criminals, but said that he believed Jon Venables and Robert Thompson, the boys who killed James Bulger, were being set free too soon. Reading this week about the apparent disintegration of Jon Venables, living under a false identity, one can only agree with him.

My novel, When I Was Joe, is about a teenager given a false identity as part of a witness protection programme. Becoming a new person at first has a seductive charm; it seems a chance to escape from the failings of the past and become someone new and better. But lying about every small aspect of your life is a trap, not an escape. If mental health is based on a robust sense of self, then having to assume a false identity amounts to the authorities imposing mental illness on those who are already stressed, vulnerable and in the case of Venables, damaged.